Andrew Ng called it "the definitive course on Claude Code," built with Anthropic and taught by Elie Schoppik. When he reposted it on December 29 with a note that there was "lots of buzz on Claude Code" that day, the announcement had pulled past 812,000 views. The pitch is narrow and explicit: this is about "highly agentic coding," where the model works autonomously for many minutes at a stretch rather than completing snippets.
Take the course. It's the cleanest on-ramp to the tool, and learning agentic coding from the team that shipped it is worth a free afternoon. But the framing is already behind the people using it hardest.
What builders are actually doing with it
The most interesting Claude Code story I read this month had nothing to do with writing software. A startup's head of growth, Ivan Falco, reportedly runs $300K a month in ad spend across Google, Meta, and LinkedIn entirely from his Claude Code terminal. [1] He built a set of custom skills off real client campaigns, some of them clearing 4X ROAS, with each skill handling a single ad-ops job in plain English. One scans search terms and cuts wasted spend by writing negative-keyword lists.
“Our head of growth, Ivan Falco, runs $300K/mo in ad spend across Google, Meta, and LinkedIn from his Claude Code terminal. He built a set of custom skills for Claude Code off the back of real client campaigns, some of them clearing 4X ROAS. Each one handles a single ad-ops job in plain English. Here's what he actually reaches for: Google Ads > negative-keywords: scans search terms and cuts wasted ”
That's not a coding workflow. It's a media buyer who turned the agent into a programmable operations console, and the unit of work he reaches for is the skill, not the snippet. The tweet describing it cleared 468 likes, which tells me the use case resonated well beyond his own team.
The pattern repeats in lower-signal corners. One trader claims Claude can "run Stock Market research like a top consulting firm" and shares prompts he says "replace $100K/year stock analysts." [2] A language learner insists "Claude did in 4 weeks what Duolingo couldn't fix in 4 years." [3] Treat both as thread-bait energy rather than evidence; they're about Claude prompts generally, not the Claude Code terminal specifically, and neither author shows their numbers. The sentiment underneath is still real. People are aiming a tool sold as a coding agent at jobs that aren't coding, and reporting that it holds up.
Where the course framing breaks
Here's my read. The Claude Code course is excellent at teaching the engine: how to let the model run autonomously, how to scope agentic tasks, how not to babysit it. What it undersells, because "agentic coding" is the headline, is that the same primitives compose into a general agentic shell. The ad-ops example is the proof. Falco didn't take a coding course and apply it sideways; he found that the skill system, the terminal context, and long-horizon autonomy are domain-agnostic, and campaigns happen to be his domain.
That gap matters for what you learn first. If you walk in thinking Claude Code is a smarter autocomplete with a personality, you'll use 10% of it. If you walk in thinking of it as a place to encode any repeatable expert workflow as a custom skill, the coding examples become one instance of a much larger pattern. The course gets you to the first mental model. The community is living in the second.
What builders actually said
The strongest argument for the course is the one Ng makes implicitly: there's a real skill to agentic coding, where the model works for many minutes unattended, and most people are doing it badly. A structured walkthrough from Anthropic and Schoppik closes that gap faster than scattered blog posts. That's a defensible reason for an experienced developer to spend the time.
The strongest argument from the field cuts the other way. The highest-engagement Claude Code story in my feed was a growth marketer running six figures of ad spend, not a developer shipping a feature. [1]
“BREAKING: Claude can now run Stock Market research like a top consulting firm (for free). Here are 10 Claude prompts that replace $100K/year stock analysts (Save for later)”
The contradiction isn't really a contradiction. The course teaches the mechanism; the community demonstrates the range. Where I'll adjudicate: the non-coding claims are mostly unverified individual anecdotes and should be read as sentiment, while the course's coding focus is the safe, primary-source truth of what the tool was built for. Both are pointing at the same underlying fact, which is that custom skills plus long-horizon autonomy generalize past the demo.
If you're installing it this week
Do the course. It's the fastest path to using Claude Code the way it was designed, and the agentic-coding fundamentals transfer to everything else.
Then ignore its boundaries. The move that separates power users from dabblers is building custom skills for your own repeated work, coding or not. Watch the skill ecosystem specifically: the ad-ops example suggests the high-value pattern is one skill per narrow, well-defined job, written in plain English and reused across projects. The reason people are running ad campaigns, research, and tutoring from a coding tool is that nobody told the tool it was only for coding. The course won't tell you that either. The buzz will.
Sources
Primary source: Lots of buzz on Claude Code here today. This short course, created with Anthropic, is the best way to learn to use it well. Please enjoy it!
- Tweet by @MichLieben — @MichLieben · community
- Tweet by @ajitcodes — @ajitcodes · community
- Tweet by @primemans — @primemans · community